Skip to content

Comparison overview

Compare the Mac window manager you use today.

Each page compares the day-to-day tradeoff that usually drives the switch: snapping precision, automatic tiling, window switching, search, previews, and whether your layout stays intact once the desktop gets crowded.

Workflow matrix

Workflow Rectangle Magnet AeroSpace yabai AltTab Tangrid
Snapping
Core

Shortcuts and configurable snap areas.

Core

Drag edges, shortcuts, and menu bar.

Core

Keyboard-first tiling and resize flow.

Core

BSP tiling with command-driven control.

Not a focus

Built for switching first.

Core

Snap inside a broader workflow.

Window switching
Separate

Usually handled by macOS or another tool.

Separate

Usually handled elsewhere.

Separate

Usually paired with macOS or another tool.

Command-first

Directional focus works without visual previews.

Core

Built around switching to any window.

Built-in

Part of the same product layer.

Search exact window
Out of scope

Not part of the core snapping workflow.

Out of scope

Not part of the main pitch.

Out of scope

Not part of the core tiling model.

Scriptable

Queries are available through the command line.

Not highlighted

Official messaging centers switching and thumbnails.

Built-in

Vertical search is designed for dense apps.

Preview-led navigation
Out of scope

Placement is the main job.

Light

Placement-first workflow.

Out of scope

Not preview-led by design.

Out of scope

Designed around commands rather than thumbnails.

Core

Thumbnail browsing is the main interaction.

Core

Switcher and Dock preview stay visual.

Layout cleanup as windows change
Manual

Windows move when you invoke a snap action.

Manual

Mostly one move at a time.

Core

Automatic tiling keeps windows arranged.

Core

BSP layouts react as managed windows change.

Separate

Placement remains another tool's job.

Auto Flow

Layouts can stay orderly as windows change.